Movement Toward Equity-Based Economic Development: And Directions Post-COVID-19

In a recent article in the Urban Affairs Review with Aaron Deslatte and Megan E. Hatch, we find that local governments can overcome the "lock in" effects from previous economic development decisions.  It takes concerted commitment across different levels of government to ensure greater equity within communities.  Finding mechanisms to mitigate economic development competition between neighboring governments could ensure a more equitable growth path, as can greater own-source resources.  The last level, own-source resources, will be tough as local and state governments grapple with the economic implications of COVID-19.  Thus finding additional solutions to overcome these hurdles will take work. 

Co-authors, Darrin Wilson, Brad Johnson, Michael Overton and I, in a recent Public Administration Review article, suggest that the Institutional Collective Action framework is one path forward whereby local governments need to find innovative solutions that foster greater coordination and cooperation.  Dividing the innovative approaches underway into those that are supply- and demand-side, we suggest what is happening and how governments can leverage these relationships to ensure economic recovery.

Aaron Deslatte, Megan E. Hatch, and I, in a recent Public Administration Review article, also suggest that achieving greater equity and sustainability as a result of COVID-19 is a possibility and they should use current grant structures already in place to do so such as the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG).